← Ingredients

Substrates

Agrocybe dura

Loading ratings…

A grassland agaric listed as edible in historical and scientific catalogues for Hong Kong and China. Taxonomic concepts and practical food value vary; the listings do not establish safe identification or culinary practice.

Three whole pale mushrooms and two lengthwise halves show brown gills, white flesh and soil-flecked stems on a warm ivory background.

Name and taxonomic scope

The name followed here is Agrocybe dura (Bolton) Singer, based on Agaricus durus Bolton (1788). Index Fungorum accepts the name and Species Fungorum treats Agrocybe molesta as a synonym, although some regional accounts retain that name or apply A. dura to a narrower or broader concept. North American sources note overlap with the A. praecox group and that microscopy may be needed. These records should not be collapsed into one certain field concept. [Index Fungorum](https://www.indexfungorum.org/names/namesrecord.asp?RecordID=356857); [Species Fungorum](https://www.speciesfungorum.org/names/names.asp?strGenus=Agrocybe); [MushroomExpert](https://www.mushroomexpert.com/agrocybe_dura.html); [E-Flora BC](https://linnet.geog.ubc.ca/Atlas/Atlas.aspx?sciname=Agrocybe+dura).

Field descriptions place this saprotrophic, brown-spored agaric in lawns, grass, meadows, pastures and nutrient-rich disturbed soils. They describe a pale cap that can crack as it dries or ages, darkening gills and a fragile veil or ring zone. These features explain common names such as cracked-cap agrocybe; they are not a safe field key. It is not the poplar-associated pioppino Cyclocybe cylindracea, often called Agrocybe aegerita in older literature. [Iowa State Herbarium](https://www.herbarium.iastate.edu/files/fungi/Agrocybe%20dura%20%28Bolton%29%20Singer.pdf); [Naturalis](https://mushrooms.linnaeus.naturalis.nl/linnaeus_ng/app/views/species/nsr_taxon.php?id=100119).

Sources for this section

Food-status records and uncertainty

Boa's FAO overview lists A. dura as edible and medicinal in its Hong Kong country record, citing Chang and Mao (1995); a 2026 Chinese species catalogue also lists it among edible and medicinal fungi. These sources establish country-level classifications, not a specific recipe, preparation method, household survey or assurance that an unidentified wild specimen is safe. Other food guides differ about practical quality, so the record should preserve the source claims without turning them into foraging advice. No specific regional dish or preservation practice was substantiated. A medicinal catalogue label is not a health claim. [FAO Annex 2](https://www.fao.org/4/y5489e/y5489e13.htm); [Wu et al. 2026](https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/jwxb/CN/1256540739983519893).

Sources for this section

Habitat, seasons and recorded places

Seasonal summaries vary: a Naturalis guide gives spring to summer, an Iowa State sheet says summer, a Norfolk reserve list gives spring to late summer, and a North American account allows spring through fall with May most likely in temperate areas. Norfolk records include June and July observations and an older October record. A Polish inventory documents a voucher collected on 11 June 1971 near Szaflary Dolne and Nowy Targ. These are local observations, not a universal calendar. [Naturalis](https://mushrooms.linnaeus.naturalis.nl/linnaeus_ng/app/views/species/nsr_taxon.php?id=100119); [Iowa State Herbarium](https://www.herbarium.iastate.edu/files/fungi/Agrocybe%20dura%20%28Bolton%29%20Singer.pdf); [Norfolk Fungus Study Group](https://thenfsg.co.uk/Taxon_page.php?Taxon=Agrocybe+dura); [Komorowska 2023](https://www.botany.pl/images/Books/Komorowska_2023_Agaricomycotina.pdf).

Photographic records include Croatia, Kansas and Trzciana in Poland, with dates and confidence limits described in the image dossier. The index's Hong Kong and China entries relate to food-status sources, not collection sites for these field observations. The two evidence types should remain separate. [Wikimedia Commons image records](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Agrocybe_dura).

Sources for this section

Safety and limits

Pale Agrocybe species overlap in appearance and the limits of the A. dura concept vary among regional sources. A photo, cap colour, cracking, habitat or season cannot establish edible identity. The available food records justify reporting catalogue claims, not recommending wild collection or consumption. The history period remains unknown: a 1995 citation is a dated attestation, not the beginning of use. [MushroomExpert](https://www.mushroomexpert.com/agrocybe_dura.html); [E-Flora BC](https://linnet.geog.ubc.ca/Atlas/Atlas.aspx?sciname=Agrocybe+dura).

Sources for this section

Places

Hong Kong

Historical attestation · Country evidence

Country-level FAO edible-and-medicinal list; it does not identify a collection locality.

China

Documented use · Country evidence

Country-level scientific edible-and-medicinal catalogue; no particular collection locality or dish is given.

Related

Community

No community contributions have been published for this entry yet.

Share what you made

Sign in to contribute. Published comments and photos are free to read.

Sources