← Ingredients

Cultures

Rhizopus (amylolytic mould in parakari)

Loading ratings…

A Rhizopus mould stage converts starch in cassava for the Wapishana drink parakari. The published abstracts name the mould and its role but not the full culture method.

What it is

In parakari, the mould stage is the first step that turns the starch of cassava into sugars that a yeast can then ferment. The mould is a Rhizopus species, a filamentous fungus. The published study names it as an amylolytic Rhizopus, meaning one that breaks starch down, and it is kept on this page as the mould that makes that step possible in parakari.

The page covers the mould as it is used in this one drink. It does not present a general Rhizopus culture for other foods, which are covered on their own pages.

Sources for this section

Its role in parakari

The Mycologia abstract describes parakari as an alcoholic drink made by cassava fermentation. The mould stage comes first and is followed by a second, solid-substrate ethanol fermentation. The mould makes sugars available from the starch, and the yeast then ferments those sugars to alcohol.

The abstract reports two things that shape the mould stage: the choice of cassava variety, and control of the culture temperature. It also reports that purified starch was added to raise the inoculum potential of the Rhizopus. These are features of the reported practice, not measured limits.

Sources for this section

Why the stage matters

Cassava starch is not sugar, so something has to break it down before alcoholic fermentation can run. In this practice that work is done by the mould rather than by added enzyme. The source does not measure the starch breakdown, the sugar levels reached or the time the stage takes, so the page does not give those figures.

The mould stage and the yeast stage run in sequence, so the conditions of the first affect the second. The abstract says that temperature is controlled, but it gives no range, which is why no temperature is stated here.

Sources for this section

Sourcing and handling

The abstracts do not say where the mould culture was obtained, how it was carried from one batch to the next, or how it was stored. The carrier used for the inoculum is not named. A home version would need that information and a qualified review before it could be attempted, so none is proposed here.

Sources for this section

Context across the Amazon

Fungal saccharification of starch is described as a practice across parts of Amazonia. The ethnohistoric review by Goeldi Museum researchers treats amylolytic fermentation as a broad regional pattern, so the parakari culture belongs to a wider family of methods. The review does not establish that every such method uses the same mould.

Sources for this section

Limits and open questions

The full article was not read in this record, so the exact Rhizopus species, the inoculum carrier and the full sequence of the mould stage are not stated. No safety control for the mould stage is established by these sources. A future page should take those details from the full study and from community sources in Guyana, and should be reviewed before any home use is described.

Sources for this section

Places

Aishalton, South Rupununi, Guyana

Documented preparation · Locality evidence

The study documents two Wapishana women in Aishalton in the 1990s, published 2005. It does not describe the mould across other communities.

Related

Community

No community contributions have been published for this entry yet.

Share what you made

Sign in to contribute. Published comments and photos are free to read.

Sources