← Equipment

Built structures · Masonry smoking ovens

FTT-Thiaroye smoking kiln

Loading ratings…

The FAO-Thiaroye Processing Technique separates fish cooking from smoke flavouring. A heat-retaining cooking unit, fat collector, filtered smoke generator and smoking chamber reduce direct smoke and fat contact; installations vary by place.

Illustration of an FTT fish-processing installation: a masonry oven, metal firebox, smoking racks and filter pipe under an open-sided shelter.

A system built around two separate jobs

The FAO-Thiaroye Processing Technique (FTT) is a fish-smoking system developed by FAO with Senegal’s National Training Centre for Fisheries and Aquaculture Technicians. Work began in 2008. It builds on existing fish-smoking practice but separates cooking from smoke flavouring: fish receives heat in one unit, then filtered smoke in another. That division is the defining design idea, not one fixed kiln shape or a single set of dimensions.

The FAO schematic identifies a cooking compartment, smoking compartment, furnace, ash tray, rack hood, chimney, smoke-generating chamber and filter. A fat-collecting plate sits between fish and heat source. FAO describes FTT accessories that can adapt to existing ovens, while construction and maintenance training has involved local fabricators. Those accounts describe a family of installations shaped by local facilities, not a universal blueprint.

Sources for this section

Why separate heat, fat and smoke

In a conventional direct-smoking kiln, heat and unfiltered smoke can reach the fish together, while fat may drip onto the fire. The FTT design changes those paths. Its cooking compartment uses indirect heat; the fat collector intercepts drippings; and a separate smoke generator sends filtered smoke to the smoking unit. In the Ghana study, fish was cooked with fully lit charcoal and heat-retention stones, then exposed to filtered smoke generated from moistened plant material. A moistened luffa fibre filter traps tar particles and may reduce PAH deposits.

The purpose of these components is not merely to change flavour. The design targets polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), contaminants that can form during smoking. In the Ghana comparisons, the tested FTT products had lower measured benzo(a)pyrene and PAH4 than the tested Chorkor and metal-drum kiln products, and wood fuel produced higher contamination than fully lit charcoal. Those findings apply to the study’s particular fish, fuels and equipment. They do not certify every FTT unit or product.

Sources for this section

A technology carried across local installations

The system’s history and its installations are best kept distinct. Senegal is the documented development setting. Ghana is the setting for the published comparison of kiln design and fuel. In 2023, FAO reported training Liberia’s fisheries officers and local fabricators in construction and maintenance, including components, technical drawings, assembly and maintenance. These records show the technology travelling through collaboration and adaptation; they do not establish one standardized building material, footprint or site layout.

The available sources name important parts and explain how they work, but they do not provide a universal construction schedule or complete engineering specification. Masonry, metal fittings, filters and accessory arrangements can differ by installation. This page describes the documented principle and components, not a do-it-yourself fire plan. The PAH results are a reason to understand the design, not a substitute for inspecting a kiln or validating a batch.

Sources for this section

History

FAO records collaboration with Senegal's National Training Centre for Fisheries and Aquaculture Technicians beginning in 2008. Later FAO material documents development, local fabrication and training in Ghana and Liberia; these are separate deployment contexts, not a single standard installation.

Site

SettingSmall-scale fish-processing facilities. FAO describes the technology as adaptable to local ovens and built through local fabrication and construction training.
NotesThis page describes the FTT system and its documented components across several countries, not one installation. Sources do not supply a universal foundation, footprint, material schedule or construction drawing.

A build is made where it stands: moving it means building it again.

How it is built

Risks and precautions · High risk
Smoke contaminants depend on design and operation

A Ghana study measured different PAH levels across FTT and traditional kilns and found fuel type affected results; the name of the technology alone does not validate a batch.

Hazard source
Construction details vary by installation

FAO describes local fabrication and training rather than a universal dimensioned plan; this record is not a construction or fire-safety specification.

Hazard source

Do not treat this historical and technical account as a construction drawing or food-safety validation.

The reported PAH results apply to the Ghana study’s tested fish, fuels and kilns; they do not certify every FTT installation or product.

Materials

  • Masonry or oven body — The FTT is an oven system adapted to local facilities; FAO sources describe components and construction training but do not establish one universal body material.
  • Cooking and smoking compartments — The studied design separates cooking from smoke flavouring in distinct units.
  • Fat-collecting plate or tray — A plate or tray sits between fish and the heat source to intercept dripping fat.
  • Furnace, ash tray, hood, chimney and smoke filter — The source diagram identifies these components, with the filter in the indirect smoke path.
  1. Set the cooking function apart from the smoke-flavouring function; the documented FTT schematic names separate cooking and smoking units.
  2. Arrange the fish racks above the heat source and use a fat-collecting plate between them so drippings do not fall directly into the fire.
  3. Provide a separate smoke-generation path with a filter and chimney; the design uses smoke indirectly to flavour cooked fish.
  4. Adapt the components to the local oven and processing facility. FAO describes locally led construction and maintenance training, not a single dimensioned plan for every site.
  5. Treat kiln design and fuel as process variables. The Ghana comparison found lower PAH levels in its FTT products than in the tested traditional kilns; that result belongs to the tested design and process, not every kiln called FTT.

Places

Senegal

Historical attestation · Country evidence

FAO identifies Senegal as the development setting; this country-level evidence does not identify one original kiln site.

Ghana

Documented preparation · Country evidence

The research tested FTT products and design features in Ghana; it does not define every installation.

Liberia

Documented use · Country evidence

The source documents training local fabricators and fisheries officers; it does not specify the number or exact locations of installed kilns.

Related

Community

No community contributions have been published for this entry yet.

Share what you made

Sign in to contribute. Published comments and photos are free to read.

Sources