← Ingredients

Cultures

Saccharomyces pastorianus

Loading ratings…

Saccharomyces pastorianus is the hybrid lager yeast, a cross of the ale yeast S. cerevisiae and the cold-tolerant S. eubayanus, that ferments beer at cool temperatures from the bottom of the tank.

What the yeast is

Saccharomyces pastorianus is a hybrid. It carries genetic material from the ale yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and from the cold-tolerant Saccharomyces eubayanus. Brewers call it lager yeast because it ferments at cool temperatures and settles to the bottom of the tank, which is the origin of the word bottom-fermenting.

Because it is a hybrid, its genome is not one copy of either parent. Strains differ in how much of each parent they carry and in the chromosomes they have gained or lost, which is why lager strains are sorted into groups rather than treated as one organism.

Sources for this section

Where it came from

A 2023 hypothesis by Hutzler and colleagues proposes that the hybrid arose in Munich in the early 1600s. In that account, bottom fermentation was already established in Bavaria by about 1600, and brewers used mixed top- and bottom-fermenting yeasts. The key step was the arrival of top-fermenting S. cerevisiae in a place where wild S. eubayanus was already present, rather than the reverse.

The authors name two possible sources of the S. cerevisiae parent: the Schwarzach wheat-beer brewery, whose yeast was moved to the Hofbrauhaus in 1602, and Einbeck, whose top-fermenting yeast reached Munich around 1612 to 1615. They lean towards Schwarzach but state that both are plausible, and the question is still open.

Sources for this section

Saaz and Frohberg lineages

Modern S. pastorianus strains fall into two groups. Group I, the Saaz lineage, came from the Burgerliches Brauhaus in Saaz, Bohemia, and ferments more slowly. Group II, the Frohberg lineage, came from the Frohberg brewery in Grimma, Saxony, and ferments faster. Hansen and Lindner distinguished the two in the late nineteenth century.

The two groups also differ in what they can use. Group I strains ferment only about six-sevenths of the extract that Group II strains ferment, which the sources attribute to an inability to use beta-isomaltose. Named strains therefore behave differently in the same wort, and a strain name matters more than the species name.

Sources for this section

Wild parent and open questions

The wild parent, S. eubayanus, was first described from Patagonia in 2011, and the sources note later finds in Europe, including Ireland. The origin of the wild parent is still unclear. The 2023 hypothesis is a reconstruction from brewing records and genomes, and its authors present it as a new interpretation, not a proven event.

Lost culture collections and inconsistent naming make historical isolates hard to trace. Multiple hybridisation events were probably possible, but only the Munich-derived lineages are known to have survived.

Sources for this section

Places

Munich

Historical attestation · Locality evidence

Proposed hybridisation site in a 2023 hypothesis that its authors frame as a new interpretation, not settled fact.

Bohemia

Documented use · Region evidence

Source of the Saaz (Group I) lineage, from the Burgerliches Brauhaus in Saaz.

Saxony

Documented use · Locality evidence

Source of the Frohberg (Group II) lineage, from the Frohberg brewery in Grimma.

Related

Community

No community contributions have been published for this entry yet.

Share what you made

Sign in to contribute. Published comments and photos are free to read.

Sources