← Recipes

Nata de piña

nata de piña · Nata de pina · Pineapple nata · Pineapple gel

Loading ratings…

Nata de piña is a translucent cellulose gel grown from a pineapple-peel liquid instead of coconut water. A bacterial starter is added to the cooled peel extract and the pellicle forms over 14 to 28 days in a laboratory study.

A pale translucent pineapple-peel nata de piña cellulose sheet in a shallow glass dish.

What it is

Nata de piña is a translucent gel of bacterial cellulose. It is grown from a pineapple-peel liquid, not from coconut water as nata de coco is. The pellicle forms at the liquid surface, and the chewy product comes from that cellulose.

The two products are separate. Pineapple-skin tepache is a different ferment, and the peel extract here is only a substrate for the cellulose-producing bacteria.

Sources for this section

The starter and the peel extract

The 2020 study starts with a bacterial starter grown in pineapple-peel extract for seven days at 29 degrees C. The organism is named Acetobacter xylinum. Current nomenclature places that name under Komagataeibacter xylinus, and isolates differ in how much cellulose they make.

The peel is rinsed, cut into pieces of 3 to 5 cm, homogenized and filtered. Sugar and urea are added to the filtrate. Urea is a laboratory nitrogen supplement in this study. Its use is not a claim of food suitability.

Sources for this section

How the 2020 study grew the pellicle

The medium was adjusted to pH 4 with acetic acid, boiled at 100 degrees C, and cooled to 29 to 30 degrees C. It was portioned into sterile jars with 20, 30 or 40 percent starter and incubated at 29 degrees C for 14, 21 or 28 days, with three replicates per treatment.

The reported results were 35.75 percent yield at 40 percent starter after 28 days, and 21.5 mm thickness at 40 percent after 21 days. The study identifies 21 days as optimal for thickness. The paper does not make clear whether the starter percentages are of a base or a final volume, and the yield denominator is not legible in the retrieved text.

Sources for this section

Where it is found now

The review associates nata de piña with the Philippines, along with nata de coco. That is a reported association. No source inspected dates the product or names an inventor.

A current retailer lists a packaged pineapple gel under the name nata de piña. That shows present availability only, not traditional use or manufacturing details.

Sources for this section

Uses

The review describes nata products in general as chewy jelly used in desserts, candies, ice cream, drinks, puddings and fruit cocktails. The sources do not give a documented use specific to nata de piña.

Sources for this section

Open questions and safety

No validated household recipe exists in these sources. The study had no uninoculated control and gives no household endpoint, storage period or safety protocol. Thickness and yield are not safety checks.

The urea, the starter percentage basis and the acid amount are unresolved. A food-process specialist must review any household method. Smell, taste and appearance do not establish safety.

Sources for this section

History

The 2024 review associates nata de piña with the Philippines. Retail listings show present-day availability. No source inspected dates the product or names its first maker.

Ingredients

Scaling: source batch only

Pineapple peelRinsed, cut into 3 to 5 cm pieces, homogenized and filtered to make the extract.
8 kg
per production batch in the 2020 study
SucroseAdded to 2 L of filtrate.
200 g
per 2 L filtrate, laboratory study
UreaAdded to 2 L of filtrate as a nitrogen supplement.
10 g
laboratory medium; food suitability not established
Acetic acid (to pH 4)Added to the filtrate until it reaches pH 4, before boiling.
amount not stated
Acetobacter xylinum starterGrown first in pineapple-peel extract for 7 days at 29 degrees C. Added at 20, 30 or 40 percent of the portion.
Amount not stated
the study does not make clear whether the percentage refers to a base or final volume

Method

Risks and precautions · Elevated risk
Uncontrolled spoilage

The study has no uninoculated control and gives no validated household endpoint, storage period or safety protocol.

Hazard source
Non-food additive

Urea is a laboratory nitrogen supplement in the study. Its food suitability is not established.

Hazard source

No validated household method. The study used sterile jars, laboratory starter and controlled incubation.

Smell, taste, acidity and appearance do not establish safety.

Thickness and yield are experimental measurements, not safety checks.

  1. Make a starter by inoculating 20 mL of bacterial suspension into 500 mL of pineapple-peel extract, then incubate it for 7 days at 29 degrees C.
  2. Rinse the peel, cut it into 3 to 5 cm pieces, homogenize it and filter it.
  3. Add sugar and urea to the filtrate, adjust it to pH 4 with acetic acid, and boil it at 100 degrees C.
  4. Cool the medium to 29 to 30 degrees C and portion it into sterile jars, with 20, 30 or 40 percent starter.
  5. Incubate at 29 degrees C for 14, 21 or 28 days.
  6. Measure the pellicle's thickness and yield. The study identifies 21 days as optimal for thickness.

Conditions

Fermentation14–28 days
Temperature29°C
Temperature controlIncubated

Places

Philippines

Documented use · Country evidence

The 2024 review associates nata de piña with the Philippines. This is a reported association, not a proven birthplace.

Related

Community

No community contributions have been published for this entry yet.

Share what you made

Sign in to contribute. Published comments and photos are free to read.

Sources