← Equipment

Equipment · Historical object · Jars, pots and crocks

Early Neolithic Georgian grape-wine jars

Loading ratings…

Very large early Neolithic pottery jars from Georgia carry the earliest biomolecular evidence for grape wine in the Near East. Their probable wine role is documented; their burial and exact relationship to modern qvevri are not.

Historical illustration contrasts an above-ground Neolithic Georgian clay jar with a separate modern qvevri whose body is shown buried beneath a cellar floor.

Pottery and early grape wine

Chemical residue analyses from pottery at Shulaveris Gora and Gadachrili Gora in present-day Georgia provide biomolecular evidence for grape wine around 6000–5800 BCE. The PNAS study combines that evidence with environmental and botanical findings; it calls the early jars probable combined fermentation, ageing and serving vessels. This is a reasoned functional interpretation for a common jar type, not proof of the contents or use of every individual pot.

The same study describes a large jar from nearby Khramis Didi-Gora as a useful example of the period’s pottery profile. It is nearly a metre high and wide, with estimated volume above 300 litres and a small flattened or low pedestal base. Some very large jars carry clay globules set within curved strips near the rim, interpreted as a schematic grape-cluster motif. The museum jar is a visual comparison, not one of the pottery sherds whose residue established the wine evidence.

Sources for this section

Burial is not established for the Neolithic jars

The PNAS authors explicitly say that the position of the Shulaveri and Gadachrili jars is unknown: the finds do not show whether they stood above ground or were partly or fully buried. Their small bases may invite a burial hypothesis, but that possibility is not a documented installation. The authors place the earliest archaeological evidence for qvevri winemaking in Georgia much later, in the eighth–seventh centuries BCE; the long interval prevents a claim that the Neolithic jars were modern qvevri unchanged.

A different, living Georgian practice is well documented. UNESCO describes the qvevri as an egg-shaped earthenware vessel, sealed and buried for fermentation; the National Wine Agency records regional differences, including qvevri buried in Kakhetian cellar floors and a distinct outdoor practice in western Georgia. The cutaway illustration pairs these two records for comparison: the exposed Neolithic jar is not shown underground, while the buried vessel represents the documented modern qvevri tradition.

Sources for this section

Reading the vessel evidence

Pottery is durable, but residue, shape, decoration and find position answer different questions. Chemical traces can support what a vessel held; a common jar form and botanical remains help interpret likely use; neither alone reveals its exact routine. A broad body and small base are not proof of burial, and a grape-like ornament is not itself proof of wine. The page keeps those observations separate from the present-day qvevri tradition.

This entry describes an archaeological jar class and the grape-wine evidence associated with it, rather than a complete ancient recipe or a reconstruction of a Neolithic cellar. No firing schedule, seal, lid, capacity standard, wall thickness or care instructions are reported for the class. Modern qvevri are a useful Georgian comparison, but their specific shape, burial and fermentation practice should not be projected back onto every early sixth-millennium vessel.

Sources for this section

History

McGovern et al. report chemical evidence for grape wine in pottery from Shulaveris Gora and Gadachrili Gora dated about 6000–5800 BCE. The study treats very large jars as probable combined fermentation, ageing and serving vessels, while distinguishing this evidence from later qvevri winemaking.

Equipment details

PowerNo power The jar is passive pottery. The evidence does not identify a dedicated heating system or a single way the vessels were used.
How you get oneNot established The study identifies excavated pottery but does not describe the potters, workshop, exchange or acquisition route for these particular jars.

Made of

  • Pottery clay — Vessel body
    The archaeological study describes large pottery jars; it does not specify a single clay recipe, firing technique, lining or finish for the class.
  • Applied clay strips and globules — Exterior ornament on some large jars
    A Khramis Didi-Gora example has globules within semicircular strips near the mouth; the motif is interpreted as a schematic grape cluster, not a feature of every jar.

Places

Georgia

Historical attestation · Country evidence

The PNAS study reports grape-wine evidence in pottery from Shulaveris Gora and Gadachrili Gora in present-day Georgia. This country-level row does not claim every Georgian jar was used for wine.

Kvemo Kartli

Historical attestation · Region evidence

The two sampled settlements lie in the province of Kvemo (Lower) Kartli, roughly 50 km south of Tbilisi; the source does not locate every jar in this region.

Shulaveris Gora

Historical attestation · Locality evidence

One of the two Neolithic settlements whose pottery sherds were chemically analyzed in the PNAS study.

Gadachrili Gora

Historical attestation · Locality evidence

One of the two Neolithic settlements whose pottery sherds were chemically analyzed in the PNAS study.

Related

Community

No community contributions have been published for this entry yet.

Share what you made

Sign in to contribute. Published comments and photos are free to read.

Sources